App Store Review Arbitrage
Turn competitor reviews into marketing positioning and ad copy opportunities.
Installation
- Make sure Claude is on your device and in your terminal.
Skills load from
~/.claude/skills/when Claude Code starts up — so you need it on your machine first. If you don't have it yet, install it once with the command below, then runclaudein any terminal to verify.One-time setupnpm i -g @anthropic-ai/claude-codeAlready have it? Skip ahead.
- Paste into Claude Code or into your terminal.
This copies the whole skill folder into
~/.claude/skills/app-store-review-arbitrage-varnan-tech/— the SKILL.md plus any scripts, reference docs, or templates the skill ships with. Safe default: works for every skill.Faster alternative (instruction-only skills)
Skips the clone and grabs only the SKILL.md file. Don't use this if the skill ships Python scripts, reference markdowns, or asset templates — they won't be downloaded and the skill will fail when it tries to load them.
Quick install (SKILL.md only)Sign up to copy - Restart Claude Code.
Quit and reopen Claude Code (or any other agent that loads from
~/.claude/skills/). New skills are picked up on startup. - Just ask Claude.
Skills auto-activate when your request matches the skill's description — no slash command needed. Trigger phrases live in the skill's own frontmatter; you can read them in the “What this skill does” section above.
Prefer to read the source first? Open on GitHub.
When Claude uses it
Fetches low-star App Store and Google Play reviews, clusters them into broken-promise patterns, and generates a ranked copy brief with positioning opportunities.
What this skill does
app-store-review-arbitrage
Convert a competitor's App Store or Google Play URL into a one-session GTM brief: ranked complaint clusters, a broken promise map, landing page headlines, and ad copy directions — all sourced from verbatim reviews.
Critical Rules (read before Step 1)
These rules apply throughout all steps. Violating any of them fails Self-QA (Step 6).
- Every quote must be verbatim. No paraphrase, no grammar correction, no cleaning. Exact reviewer words only.
- No fabricated statistics. Do not write "40% faster" or "2× more reliable" unless a reviewer explicitly used similar language. The Self-QA step checks for uncited percentages.
- Cluster names must use reviewer language. Study the anti-pattern table in Step 3.
- Every headline and ad copy direction must cite its source cluster. Format:
[cluster: "cluster-name"]. - Section 2 is always present in the output — even when degraded. Never skip or omit it.
- No banned words in any generated copy: powerful, robust, seamless, innovative, game-changing, streamline, leverage, revolutionize, transform.
Step 1 — Parse Input and Detect Platform
Accept a natural language prompt containing one app URL. Extract the URL.
Platform detection:
apps.apple.com→ App Storeplay.google.com/store/apps/details?id=→ Google Play- Any other URL → stop and respond: "Please provide a direct App Store or Google Play URL. I can't analyse review data from other sources."
ID extraction (do this before calling the script):
| Platform | What to extract | How |
|---|---|---|
| App Store | Numeric app_id | Digits after /id in the URL |
| App Store | country | 2-letter code after apps.apple.com/ (e.g., us, gb) |
| Google Play | package_name | Value of id= query parameter |
Persist the extracted values — you will need them for the output filename in Step 7.
If product_context was provided in the user's prompt (what their own product does), store it — used to personalise copy in Step 5.
Step 2 — Collect Reviews & Metadata
Run the full fetch script:
python3 scripts/fetch_reviews.py "{app_url}" --output {tmpdir}/asr-raw.json
(Note: Replace {tmpdir} with your operating system's temp directory, e.g., /tmp on macOS/Linux or C:\Temp on Windows).
This fetches both the store description metadata and the reviews.
- App Store: iTunes API — free, no auth. App Store reviews are fetched via Apple's public iTunes RSS feed. Some apps return 0 reviews due to Apple's API limitations — in that case the skill continues with available data and logs a warning. Google Play is the primary supported path.
- Google Play:
google-play-scraperpackage — free, no auth
If the script fails, read the error from stderr. Common causes:
- Package not installed: run
pip install google-play-scraper - App not found: verify the URL is a current, live listing
- Google Play API error: run
pip install --upgrade google-play-scraperand retry
The script will print collection progress to stderr. Wait for it to complete. After completion, read {tmpdir}/asr-raw.json and display the collection summary to the user:
✓ Collected [N] reviews ([N] low-star 1–3★) from [platform]
Date range: [oldest] to [newest]
Package: [iTunes API | google-play-scraper]
Check the exit code:
- Exit 0 → collection succeeded, check
metadata.store_description. If null: note this — Section 2 will use the degraded state. Proceed to Step 3. - Exit 1 → error (read stderr message, surface it to user, stop)
- Exit 2 → Gate 1 triggered (< 10 low-star reviews found)
Gate 1 — Low signal stop: If the script exits with code 2, read the gate_message from {tmpdir}/asr-raw.json and surface it to the user verbatim. Do not proceed to Step 3. Do not produce a partial brief.
Step 3 — Complaint Clustering
Load low_star_reviews from {tmpdir}/asr-raw.json.
Cluster all low-star reviews into 4–6 named complaint themes. Apply this formula to score each review:
complaint_weight = (4 - rating) × recency_factor
recency_factor:
review age ≤ 90 days → 1.0
review age 91–365 days → 0.7
review age > 365 days → 0.4
review age = (today's date) − (review date field) in days.
cluster_score = sum of complaint_weight for all reviews in the cluster.
Cluster naming — critical rule:
You will want to write abstract names. Resist. Use the exact verb and noun from reviews.
| ❌ Abstracted (wrong) | ✅ Reviewer language (correct) |
|---|---|
| "Stability issues" | "Crashes when exporting to PDF" |
| "Sync problems" | "Data lost after sync between phone and desktop" |
| "Monetisation friction" | "Paywall appears after 3 days, not 14 as promised" |
| "Performance degradation" | "App freezes every time I search" |
| "Onboarding issues" | "Can't figure out how to invite a teammate" |
Rules:
- Each review belongs to exactly one cluster (assign to its dominant theme)
- Discard any cluster with fewer than 3 reviews — log it as noise
- Select 3–4 verbatim quotes per cluster: lowest star rating first, then most recent
Gate 2 — Minimum cluster size: After discarding sub-3-review clusters, check how many clusters remain.
Gate 3 — Low-confidence flag: If fewer than 3 clusters remain:
- Do NOT stop. Continue to output.
- Prepend this to the brief header immediately after the app metadata:
⚠ LOW CONFIDENCE: Only [N] complaint cluster(s) met the minimum evidence threshold (≥ 3 supporting reviews). Output reflects limited data. Consider a competitor with more reviews, or broaden the rating filter.
- Include Medium-tier clusters in the output (score ≥ 5)
Tier classification (for the leaderboard table in Section 1):
- Critical: score ≥ 60
- High: score 15–59
- Medium: score 5–14 (include only when Gate 3 applies)
- Noise: score < 5 (discard, do not include)
Write clusters to {tmpdir}/asr-clusters.json:
{
"clusters": [
{
"name": "cluster name in reviewer language",
"score": 34.5,
"tier": "High",
"review_count": 14,
"verbatim_quotes": [
{"rating": 1, "text": "exact reviewer words", "date": "YYYY-MM-DD"},
...
]
}
],
"discarded_noise": 2,
"gate_3_triggered": false
}
Step 4 — Broken Promise Detection
This is the step that differentiates this skill from every existing tool. It must run as a distinct, named step.
Load:
metadata.store_descriptionfrom{tmpdir}/asr-raw.json- All clusters from
{tmpdir}/asr-clusters.json
If store_description is null: Set store_description_available: false. Write {tmpdir}/asr-promises.json with empty broken_promises array and detection_note as specified below. Proceed to Step 5.
If store description is available:
-
Extract claims. A claim is any specific, testable assertion about app behavior. See
references/broken-promise.mdfor the full definition and examples. Exclude vague superlatives, team descriptions, and press quotes. -
Cross-reference. For each claim, check all cluster names and verbatim quotes. A contradiction exists when the cluster directly documents failure of the promised behavior (minimum 3 reviews).
-
Produce broken promise records — one per confirmed contradiction:
{ "claim_text": "verbatim excerpt from store description", "complaint_cluster": "exact cluster name", "gap_label": "Claims X; users report Y", "evidence_count": 18 }
Write to {tmpdir}/asr-promises.json:
{
"store_description_available": true,
"broken_promises": [...],
"no_contradictions_found": false,
"detection_note": null
}
Degraded states:
- No description:
store_description_available: false,detection_note: "Store description unavailable (fetched YYYY-MM-DD, returned empty). Broken promise comparison cannot be performed." - No contradictions:
no_contradictions_found: true,detection_note: "No broken promises detected. Store description does not appear to overclaim relative to complaint clusters."
See references/broken-promise.md for anti-patterns (what NOT to flag).
Step 5 — Generate Copy
Using clusters from Step 3 and broken promises from Step 4, generate Sections 3–5 of the brief.
Copy rules (apply to all three sections):
- Every headline and direction must cite its source cluster:
[cluster: "cluster-name"] - No banned words: powerful, robust, seamless, innovative, game-changing, streamline, leverage, revolutionize, transform
- No fabricated statistics — no percentages or numbers unless a reviewer used them
- If
product_contextwas provided: make "Say this" directions specific to that product's features. If not: write as positioning templates the user fills in. - Use reviewer language in headlines — derive from or quote actual review text
Section 3 — Landing Page H1 Bank (3–5 headlines):
- Each:
"[headline text]" [cluster: "cluster-name"] - ≤ 8 words where possible
- Address the frustrated user directly
Section 4 — Ad Copy Directions (exactly 3 pairs):
Cluster: [cluster name]
Not that: "[what the competitor claims or a generic weak alternative]"
Say this: "[counter-claim grounded in complaint evidence]"
Evidence: [N] reviewers reported [verbatim complaint summary]
Section 5 — Anti-Claim Warnings:
- One warning per broken promise from Step 4
- If Section 2 is degraded: single note (see
references/brief-format.mdfor exact wording)
Step 6 — Self-QA
Before saving, verify the generated brief against these checks. If any check fails, fix the specific item and re-verify — do not save a failing brief.
| Check | Rule |
|---|---|
| Verbatim quotes present | Every cluster has ≥ 2 verbatim quotes |
| No banned words | None of the 9 banned words appear in Sections 3–5 |
| No uncited percentages | Any % in output must trace to a reviewer's actual words |
| All copy cited | Every headline and "Say this" has a [cluster: "name"] citation |
| Cluster count ≥ 1 | At least one cluster survived Gates 2/3 |
| Section 2 present | Section 2 appears in the output (in any state) |
| Quote ratings ≤ 3 | All verbatim quotes came from 1–3★ reviews |
Note on cluster count: The minimum for a passing brief is 1 cluster (not 3). The Gate 3 low-confidence flag handles cases where < 3 clusters survive — that is a warning, not a failure. Self-QA fails only if 0 clusters exist.
Step 7 — Save Output
Assemble the full brief per the format in references/brief-format.md.
Save to:
docs/review-briefs/[app-id]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md
Create the docs/review-briefs/ directory if it does not exist.
Print the full brief to the user.
Clean up temp files: {tmpdir}/asr-raw.json, {tmpdir}/asr-clusters.json, {tmpdir}/asr-promises.json.
Related skills
Co-Marketing Partnerships
coreyhaines31
Find ideal partners and plan joint marketing campaigns with other companies.
Idea Sprint
solanabr
Validate crypto startup ideas and decide whether they're worth building.
Jobs to be Done Canvas
product-on-purpose
Map customer motivations across functional, emotional, and social dimensions.
Last 30 Days
mvanhorn
Research recent public discussions and trends across Reddit, X, YouTube, TikTok, and other platforms.